voleospeed.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the voleospeed.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host voleospeed.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Google Inc. .

volvospeed.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called GSE containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

mostly about cycling in the "biking borough"of brent and elsewhere in london, but also touching on environment, politics, philosophy, science, society, music and art friday, 14 april 2017 a question of perception: some thoughts on the michael mason case (disclaimer: i am in no way connected with this case, except that my partner was a trustee of the cyclists defence fund, the charity that took this case to court.) michael mason was a lifelong cyclist who was cycling up regent street in central london on 25 february 2014 when he was given fatal injuries through being struck from behind by a car travelling at speed. i wrote two years ago , after a vigil had been held at the site of the collision, and the metropolitan police had refused to initiate any legal proceedings agains the driver, that: if this is allowed to stand without further legal or political challenge, the position seems to be that any good and responsible cyclist cycling in every way within the law can just expect to be be killed by a driver running them over from behind, there need be no rational explanation of the incident, and the driver may just walk away from such a killing with no legal procedure following and a blameless record. the implications are quite horrific for all who cycle on our roads. as i anticipated then, a rare private prosecution subsequently took place, funded by donations to the cyclists defence fund (cdf). and, as i acknowledged might happen, the jury did take the same view as the police, who did not want to prosecute this case, and acquitted the driver of the charge of causing death by careless driving. the vigil at the site of the killing of michael mason in 2015 nevertheless, i am absolutely certain that this case should have been brought to court. the cdf doing this brought to light a mass of evidence that was not available when i wrote in 2015. this eye-opening evidence would not have come to light otherwise. it is described in duncan dollimore's long blog post for cycling uk , and this is essential reading as background to the rest of what i write here, or certainly the first nine sections of it (down to the heading there to be seen ). i'm going to set aside here any deficiencies in the police investigation of the case, which may be regarded as serious, and just base what i write on that report of what happened in court, on the evidence that was gathered and presented to the jury. in doing this, i am assuming that the account referenced is a fair, accurate and complete one, as i was not present in court. it is, admittedly, difficult to separate the court case from the administrative cock-up that preceded it. the jury may well have been influenced by knowledge that the police had not wanted the case to go to court, though, as dollimore's account makes clear, the judge was of the opinion that it was a case that should be tried. the key points that came to light, it seems to me, are that: michael mason, cycling at night with lights and reflectors in a brightly-lit regent street, pulled out into the right-hand lane to overtake a stopping bus (as cyclists have to do constantly in uk towns and cities) after he did that he was hit squarely from behind by gail purcell's (the defendant's) car, so hard that he was thrown into the air, a large dent was made in the front right-hand bonnet of the car, and he subsequently died from head injuries. purcell claimed never to have seen him, though she said she heard an impact purcell did not stop until made to do so by a witness who ran after her and caught her at traffic lights. these are my reflections: 'seeing' is an internal fact of a person's consciousness, a product of eye, brain and mind (if these are considered separate entities). no-one other than gail purcell can really know whether she saw michael mason on his bike before or during the collision, or whether she saw anything that might indicate to her she had been involved in a collision. whether she saw anything or not is fundamentally unprovable in a court case. i daresay the jury took this view, and acquitted her, choosing to believe her account that she did not see anything, or to give her the benefit of the doubt, given that it could never be proved whether or not she was telling the truth about what she saw. they may even have considered that the fact that she did not stop after the crash tended to corroborate the view that she was telling the truth in claiming not to have seen anything. (an alternative interpretation, of course, is that she was aware of what had happened, and was fleeing the scene.) however, that a driver should remain on the road when their perception of what is going on around them has been, on one tragic occasion, and could be again, so appallingly inadequate as to allow them to kill a human being right in front of their car who should have been plainly visible, that they should remain on the road, driving, with no sanction, is deeply worrying. can driving with such deficient awareness be regarded as, by definition, 'careless' driving in the meaning of the law? this jury, and juries in many other comparable cases, have answered this question: 'no'. but are they competent to make this judgement, and where does that leave the protection of vulnerable road users? i'm no fan of jury trials in general, not just in road traffic cases, but in normal criminal cases. i've been on a few juries, and not been impressed with how the system works. i don't think the british 'trial by jury' system leads to an honest, dispassionate search for the truth. i think jury trials tend to be a kind of costumed masque, a theatrical put-on, where a selection of the general public somewhat selected for their lower than average educational or professional attainments are attempted to be cajoled, or tricked, by slick professional actors into believing stories that are not true, or into believing that true accounts are a pack of lies. the side with the better, more convincing actors has a good chance of winning, whether it is in the right or not. juries are not a cross-section of the population. too many people are able to get out of serving on juries, one way and another, and they tend to be the more intelligent part of the population. anyone connected with the justice system or the police is barred from being on a jury, as are teachers, doctors and members of the armed forces: together, a very significant slice of the higher-attaining segment of the population. other professionals seem to be able to argue easily they have responsibilities that absolve them from the duty. others just refuse to go, and nothing seems to happen to them. so juries tend to be composed mostly of lower-skilled employees, housewives and tradespeople. in cases of cycling deaths caused by bad driving, this is a particularly problematic situation. it amounts to a motorist being tried by other motorists, by, most likely, rat-running school-run mothers and white van men, who probably do believe that cyclists should not really be on the road, and are responsible for the perilous position in which they put themselves. such jurors likely put themselves in the position of the driver who, though an 'understandable' lapse of attention, has managed to do fatal damage. drivers who never cycle just perceive the situation on the roads in a very different way to people who do cycle on the roads, those who do cycle on the roads are a small minority of the population, and it really looks like this affects justice in cases of cycle fatalities. as mark treasure has pointed out, of 276 drivers involved in fatal cycling collisions between 2007-14, only 80 received a disqualification. 71% were left free to carry on driving. just imagine it if all cases of personal harm occurring in the course of robberies were tried by juries of thieves. they would obviously tend to let the defendants off, sympathising with them, feeling that 'theft is just a thing that you do, a way of making a living, and sometimes thing go wron

URL analysis for voleospeed.co.uk

http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/2016/05/
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/search/label/boris%20johnson
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/search/label/trams
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/2011/06/understanding-walking-and-cycling-deja.html
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/2011/06/walk-down-piccadilly.html
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/2011/08/another-discussion-of-dutch-style.html
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/search/label/bradley%20wiggins
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/search/label/addison%20lee
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/search/label/super-corridor
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/2013/03/a-vision-of-change.html
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/search/label/brent%20cross%20crickelwood
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/search/label/southwark
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/2016/07/the-cycle-superhighway-reaches-hyde-park.html
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/search/label/bristol
http://www.voleospeed.co.uk/search/label/localism
southwarknews.co.uk
cycling-embassy.org.uk
bbc.co.uk
cyclistsdefencefund.org.uk
tfl.gov.uk
london.gov.uk
cambridgecyclist.co.uk
davidarditti.co.uk
beyondthekerb.org.uk
boriswatch.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
voleospeed.co.uk

Registrant:
David Arditti

Registrant type:
Unknown

Registrant's address:
94 Stag Lane
Edgware
Middlesex
HA8 5LW
United Kingdom

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Dec-2012

Registrar:
Namesco Limited [Tag = NAMESCO]
URL: http://www.names.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 07-Jul-2012
Expiry date: 07-Jul-2020
Last updated: 21-Jul-2016

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns0.phase8.net
ns1.phase8.net
ns2.phase8.net

WHOIS lookup made at 06:42:12 06-Mar-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS voleospeed.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION David Arditti

TYPE
Unknown

ADDRESS
94 Stag Lane
Edgware
Middlesex
HA8 5LW
United Kingdom
Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Dec-2012

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR Namesco Limited [Tag = NAMESCO]

  CREATED 2012-07-07

  CHANGED 2016-07-21

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS0.PHASE8.NET 81.88.63.114

  NS1.PHASE8.NET 85.233.160.68

  NS2.PHASE8.NET 85.233.164.62

  NAME voleospeed.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .